State v. Fry
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.
The primary issue presented on this appeal is whether the search of the locked glove compartment of the defendant's automobile after his arrest for trespass to land was justified as a search incident to an arrest. The defendant claims that the search did not qualify as a search incident to an arrest under either sec. 968.11, Stats., art. I, sec. 11 of the Wisconsin Constitution, or the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution. No challenge is made to the validity of the defendant's arrest. We conclude that the search was legal. We also conclude that the evidence was sufficient to…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- State Of Iowa Vs. Robert Joseph VanceSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- State v. EasonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. RichardsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Karlin v. FoustCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.