Hamel v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtSharer, J.
In this appeal we are asked to determine whether the search of a locked glove compartment comes within the scope of a lawful search incident to arrest, as enunciated in New York v. Belton, 1 and applied in subsequent cases. We shall hold that it does.
Following a non-jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, Jason Keith Hamel, appellant, was convicted of a single count of possession of a firearm in connection with a drug trafficking offense. The primary evidence against appellant—the firearm and a quantity of cocaine—was admitted after denial of his motion to suppress, which was…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Briscoe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- McCain v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Upshur v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012