Legal Opinion

Hamel v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 6, 2008No. 2129, Sept. Term, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharer, J.

In this appeal we are asked to determine whether the search of a locked glove compartment comes within the scope of a lawful search incident to arrest, as enunciated in New York v. Belton, 1 and applied in subsequent cases. We shall hold that it does.

Following a non-jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, Jason Keith Hamel, appellant, was convicted of a single count of possession of a firearm in connection with a drug trafficking offense. The primary evidence against appellant—the firearm and a quantity of cocaine—was admitted after denial of his motion to suppress, which was…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Briscoe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. McCain v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Upshur v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  4. Kelly v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API