State v. Thompson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Justice.
We observe first that it is problematic whether the officers’ conduct in this instance constituted a “seizure”, thus invoking the protection of the Fourth Amendment. “ ‘No one is protected by the Constitution against the mere approach of police officers in a public place.’ United States v. Hill, 340 F. Supp. 344 (E.D. Pa. 1972).” State v. Streeter, 283 N.C. 203, 208, 195 S.E. 2d 502, 506 (1973). Because we consider the officers’ conduct to be constitutionally permissible under the standards governing an actual “seizure”, however, our consideration will proceed on the assump*706tion…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Joyce E. Hall, A/K/A Joyce E. SuttonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. William Garland BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Frederick Dale AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. SteenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. RinckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.