Norton v. Warner Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
The question in this case is whether Nicholas Rusin, a bargeman employed by respondent, is entitled to compensation under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (44 Stat. 1424, 33 U. S. C. § 901) for injuries received when a capstan bar, which he was using to shift the barge at a pier, pulled out and struck him upon the chest and caused him to fall. The answer turns on whether Rusin was a “master or member of a crew of any vessel.” If he was, he is not entitled to the compensation because such persons are expressly excluded from the coverage of the Act by § 2 (3) and § 3 (a)…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by188 opinions
- Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Offshore Co. v. RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.