Legal Opinion

Norton v. Warner Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 27, 1944No. 362PublishedCited by 188 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

The question in this case is whether Nicholas Rusin, a bargeman employed by respondent, is entitled to compensation under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (44 Stat. 1424, 33 U. S. C. § 901) for injuries received when a capstan bar, which he was using to shift the barge at a pier, pulled out and struck him upon the chest and caused him to fall. The answer turns on whether Rusin was a “master or member of a crew of any vessel.” If he was, he is not entitled to the compensation because such persons are expressly excluded from the coverage of the Act by § 2 (3) and § 3 (a)…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Davis v. Department of Labor and Industries of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by188 opinions

  1. Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Cardillo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Offshore Co. v. RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  5. Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API