Legal Opinion
Davenport v. Quinn
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 18, 1999No. AC 17648PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff filed this action seeking to satisfy the default judgment that he had obtained in a prior action against the Pub of Manchester, Inc. (Pub, Inc.), for $75,000 in damages. Pub, Inc., was doing business as a bar under the name Bowties. The plaintiff sought to pierce the corporate veil, claiming that the defendant Daniel Quinn1 was the alter ego of Pub, Inc., and that he had fraudulently transferred corporate assets in violation of General Statutes §§ 52-552a through 52-5521 in order to avoid payment of the default judgment. The trial court held that the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Amodio v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Weiss v. WiederlightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Angelo Tomasso, Inc. v. Armor Construction & Paving, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Ecker v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Global NAPs Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Naples v. Keystone Building & Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Foisie v. Worcester Polytechnic Inst.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- Inter-Tel Technologies, Inc. v. Linn Station Properties, LLCKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Litchfield Asset Management Corp. v. HowellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.