Legal Opinion
Lundgren v. Vigilant Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 12, 1986No. C6-86-677PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This appeal is from summary judgment entered for respondent Vigilant Insurance in a declaratory judgment action brought to determine whether appellant Douglas Lundgren had underinsured motorists coverage under a policy issued by Vigilant to the family business, Lundgren Excavating. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Douglas Lundgren was injured by an object thrown up by a passing car while he was working near a road on a project for the family business, Lundgren Excavating. Lundgren settled with the owner of the passing car for the limits of his policy.
Lundgren Excavating had a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kaysen v. Federal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark v. ViktoraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Polzin v. Phoenix of Hartford InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Maher v. All Nation Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- Rademacher v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- American Economy Insurance Co. v. BogdahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Concrete Services, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Carrington v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Andrade v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
- Mikulay v. Home Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.