Carrington v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HEFFERNAN, CHIEF JUSTICE.
This is a review of a published decision of the court of appeals, Carrington v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 164 Wis. 2d 148, 473 N.W.2d 591 (Ct. App. 1991), reversing a summary judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee county, Victor Manían, Circuit Judge, which concluded that Dorothea Evans and Cameron J. Carrington (the children) were "occupancy insureds" rather than "named insureds" under an insurance policy issued to Sunburst Youth Homes, Inc. (Sunburst), by St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. (St. Paul), and therefore were unable to "stack" uninsured motorist…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Tahtinen v. MSI InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Cunningham v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
- Thompson v. GRANGE INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Buckner v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Cardinal v. Leader National Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Bushey v. Northern Assurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Matthiesen v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Weimer v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- West Bend Mutual Insurance v. PlaymanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.