Legal Opinion

Mikulay v. Home Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 1989No. C5-88-2599PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

Thelma Mikulay appeals from the trial court’s judgment and order denying her motion for amended findings or a new trial wherein the court concluded that she was not an insured under a commercial automobile policy and, therefore, not entitled to underinsured motorist coverage. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Thelma Mikulay was seriously injured while riding as a passenger in an underinsured, non-scheduled motor vehicle on October 17, 1985. 1 At the time of the accident, and for some years prior, Miku-lay’s husband, Arnold, and his brother/business partner, Leonard, were insured…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Nichols v. Shelard National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Jurek v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jensen v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  2. New Millennium Consulting, Inc. v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  3. Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. Aspen II Holding Co., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
  4. Sipe v. Fleetwood Motor Homes of Pennsylvania, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
  5. Sipe v. FLEETWOOD MOTOR HOMES OF PENNSYLVANIADistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API