Mikulay v. Home Indemnity Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
Thelma Mikulay appeals from the trial court’s judgment and order denying her motion for amended findings or a new trial wherein the court concluded that she was not an insured under a commercial automobile policy and, therefore, not entitled to underinsured motorist coverage. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Thelma Mikulay was seriously injured while riding as a passenger in an underinsured, non-scheduled motor vehicle on October 17, 1985. 1 At the time of the accident, and for some years prior, Miku-lay’s husband, Arnold, and his brother/business partner, Leonard, were insured…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Nichols v. Shelard National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Jurek v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jensen v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- New Millennium Consulting, Inc. v. United Healthcare Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. Aspen II Holding Co., Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
- Sipe v. Fleetwood Motor Homes of Pennsylvania, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Sipe v. FLEETWOOD MOTOR HOMES OF PENNSYLVANIADistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008