Legal Opinion

State v. Goff

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 22, 1988No. C3-86-2130PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYNE, Justice.

In State v. Edmison, 379 N.W.2d 85, 86 (Minn.1985), we held that “if a criminal defendant properly raises the issue, * * * then the sentencing court may not use a prior misdemeanor conviction in computing the presumptive sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines for the current offense unless the state proves that the prior conviction was not obtained in violation of the defendant’s right to counsel.” We now hold that in order to raise the issue with respect to a prior conviction — felony, gross misdemeanor, or misdemeanor — a defendant must do more than simply request that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. EdmisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Howard Mattheson v. Ross Maggio, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, and William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. State v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. MaurstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. State v. MellettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  5. State v. ClipperCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API