Legal Opinion

State v. Edmison

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 27, 1985No. C9-85-601PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

The sole issue we address on this appeal is whether a sentencing court may use a defendant’s prior misdemeanor conviction in determining the presumptive sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines for the current offense without regard to whether the prior conviction was obtained in violation of the defendant’s rights to counsel. The Court of Appeals, relying on its decision in State v. Andren, 358 N.W.2d 428 (Minn.App.1984), rejected as “without merit” the defendant’s contention that a prior misdemeanor conviction may not be used if the conviction was obtained in violation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. State v. BorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. State v. MarquettiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State v. McFeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. State v. GoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Caucus Distributors, Inc. v. Commissioner of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. State v. RubinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API