Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 17, 1992No. C6-90-1896PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KEITH, Chief Justice.

This appeal, on petition for review by the state, presents a Sentencing Guidelines issue relating to the appropriate procedures and standards for deciding whether an offender’s “out-of-state” felony conviction should be designated as a felony in determining the offender’s criminal history score and presumptive sentence for the current Minnesota offense of conviction for which the offender is being sentenced.1 Without purporting to answer all questions relating to the appropriate procedures and standards in this context, we conclude that the sentencing court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. McAdooSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. MarquettiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. State v. BritonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. State v. IbarraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. John Robert HoymanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. State v. ReeceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. State v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. State v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API