Legal Opinion
State v. Warren
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 26, 1988No. C3-87-369PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
This case concerns use of a misdemeanor plea in computing a defendant’s criminal history score. We agree with the court of appeals that such a plea must have a factual basis, State v. Warren, 407 N.W.2d 482, 484 (Minn.App.1987), but, unlike the court of appeals, we conclude on the record as a whole that the factual basis requirement is satisfied in this case, and that the trial court’s computation of the criminal history score was, therefore, correct.
Defendant Donald Warren, having pled guilty to rape of an 81-year-old woman, appeals the length of his 81-month prison…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. TrottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. NordstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. McFeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- United States v. LinngrenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- State v. CondonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. JoseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.