Legal Opinion

Santa Clara Valley Mill and Lumber Co. v. Hayes

California Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1888No. 11290PublishedCited by 51 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSearls, C. J.

This is an action to recover ten thousand dollars for a breach of a contract entered into between plaintiff, a corporation, and defendants, who were ngaged in the manufacture of lumber near Felton in the county of Santa Cruz, whereby the latter agreed to and deliver to the former during the lumber year *389of 1881 two million feet of lumber at eleven dollars per thousand feet. Defendants agreed not to manufacture any lumber to be sold during said period, in the counties of Monterey, San Benito, Santa Cruz, or Santa Clara, except under the contract, and to pay plaintiff twenty dollars per thousand…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. FisherNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  2. The Saratoga County Bank v. . KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Stanton v. AllenNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Valentine v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Doolin v. WardNew York Supreme Court · 1810

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  3. Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Lorrie Poublon v. C.H. Robinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API