Legal Opinion

Newman v. Baldwin

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1958PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen McGivern, J.

Defendant United Dye & Chemical Corporation moved to dismiss the consolidated complaint in *898this stockholders’ derivative action solely on the grounds (1) that, since the corporation in whose right this action is brought is a Delaware corporation, Delaware law governs the question of whether it was necessary to allege demand on the stockholders that the action be brought, (2) that Delaware law requires .such demand and (3) that the complaint is insufficient for failure to allege such demand.

This court is of the view that Delaware law governs. (See Restatement, Conflict of Laws, § 183, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Continental Securities Co. v. . BelmontNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Russian Reinsurance Co. v. StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Mayer v. AdamsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
  5. Steinberg v. HardyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Twomey v. Mitchum, Jones & Templeton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Galef v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  3. Hausman v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. Galef v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. Hausman v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API