Legal Opinion
Mayer v. Adams
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided April 15, 1958PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Southerland, Chief Justice:
The case concerns Rule 23(b) of the Rules of the Court of Chancery, Del.C.Ann. relating to stockholders’ derivative suits. The second sentence of paragraph (b) provides :
“The complaint shall also' set forth with particularity the efforts of the plaintiff to secure from the managing directors or trustees and, if necessary, from the shareholders such action as he desires, and the reasons for his failure to obtain such action or the reasons for not making such effort.”
The question is:
Under what circumstance is a preliminary demand on shareholders necessary?
Plaintiff is…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Rogers v. Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United Copper Securities Co. v. Amalgamated Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Keenan v. EshlemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- Abbey v. Control Data Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Maldonado v. FlynnCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1980
- Maldonado v. FlynnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.