Legal Opinion
Steinberg v. Hardy
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 24, 1950No. Civ. A. 2806PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HINCKS, Chief Judge.
This is a secondary action under Rule 23(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., by two alleged stockholders of Barium Steel Corp. (“Barium”) a Delaware corporation, naming as defendants Barium, Central Iron and Steel Co. (“Central”), which is a Pennsylvania corporation wholly owned by Barium, Hardy who was a Barium director and one Buckley both of whom are • citizens of Connecticut. The complaint alleges that the corporate defendants for the benefit of which the action is brought were mulcted through fraudulent transactions in which the individual defendants…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Rita Gottesman v. General Motors Corporation and E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Hausman v. BuckleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Pomerantz v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1951
- Samuel Meltzer v. Atlantic Research CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Escoett v. Aldecress Country ClubSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.