Legal Opinion

South Side Roofing & Material Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1948PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The respondent Armbruster, upon this' last claim, insists upon the existence of a bodily condition of weakness allegedly resulting from injuries occurring during his employment by three successive employers. The Industrial Commission, in passing upon the claim, decided that it was proper'to divide the liability and apportion it in equal degrees among the three employers. The employers were successive, and there was a considerable period of time between employments. Lacking jurisdiction to make an award against the first employer because of the lapse of time and a' former decision, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. American Rolling Mill Co. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Welhouse v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Western Lime & Cement Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. M. & M. Realty Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Giant Grip Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Semons Department Store v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Merton Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Shelby Mutual Insurance v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API