Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosen berry, C. J.
Two major questions are presented in this case by the contentions made by the respective par*139ties: (1st) Did the deceased give his employer “actual notice” of his disability on August 21, 1923, as found by the commission? (2d) If the notice was sufficient, what legal consequences follow therefrom? In view of some considerations to which it will be necessary to recur at a later point in the discussion, we commence our consideration with the 1919 statute, which was in effect at the time the deceased suffered a disability on January 14, 1920. The section relating to notice was section 2394 — -11,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. McCormickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Schaefer & Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Scott & Howe Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Falk Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Montello Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Acme Body Works v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Clausen v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Green Bay Drop Forge Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Wisconsin Granite Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.