Legal Opinion
Merton Lumber Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided November 9, 1951PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The examiner’s memorandum, quoted above, down to the asterisk is a fair statement of the medical evidence. Then follow the examiner’s conclusions:
“The. examiner. is of the opinion that the incident of March 10, 1949, did not constitute an injury caused by accident. It appears to have been too insignificant and the applicant’s condition at that time to have been too vulnerable to constitute an industrial accident.”
This, formalized as a finding of fact, resulted in the commission’s order dismissing Rankin’s compensation claim against the M. and M. Realty Company. We find testimony to support…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Schmitt v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- South Side Roofing & Material Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wagner v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Johnston v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Giant Grip Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Quinn v. Automatic Sprinkler Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Geathers v. 3V, INC.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.