Western Lime & Cement Co. v. Industrial Commission

The appellants contend that there was a failure on the part of the claimant to present sufficient evidence before the Commission upon which it could be properly said that the injury of March 10th was proximately caused by the injury of January 15th (sec. 102.03 (3), Stats.) ; and that therefore such was not while said Boll was performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment. Sec.. 102.03 (2).

Appellants rely upon the unquestioned rule applicable in such class of cases that there must be a showing made by the claimant, in order to sustain an award for such a subsequent…