Legal Opinion

In Re Witherspoon

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1984No. G001969PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TROTTER, P. J.

Petitioner was adjudged in contempt after testifying as a witness against himself over his Fifth Amendment objection. In a dissolution action, petitioner’s wife cited him for contempt, alleging wilful failure to pay court-ordered child support. At the hearing, petitioner was represented by court-appointed counsel, a deputy public defender. Wife’s counsel attempted to call petitioner as a witness in her case-in-chief. Initially, the trial court sustained petitioner’s assertion of a Fifth Amendment privilege not to incriminate himself. Nevertheless, wife’s counsel persisted…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex parte GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hawk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Raiden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Killpatrick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. In Re LemonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. BeesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Conn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. People v. DernerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API