In Re Witherspoon
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TROTTER, P. J.
Petitioner was adjudged in contempt after testifying as a witness against himself over his Fifth Amendment objection. In a dissolution action, petitioner’s wife cited him for contempt, alleging wilful failure to pay court-ordered child support. At the hearing, petitioner was represented by court-appointed counsel, a deputy public defender. Wife’s counsel attempted to call petitioner as a witness in her case-in-chief. Initially, the trial court sustained petitioner’s assertion of a Fifth Amendment privilege not to incriminate himself. Nevertheless, wife’s counsel persisted…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex parte GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hawk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Raiden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Killpatrick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- In Re LemonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. BeesonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Conn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. DernerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.