Ex parte Gould
California Supreme Court
Hearing in the Supreme Court upon a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
In an action pending in the superior court in and for the county of Tuba, wherein the county of Sacramento is plaintiff, and the petitioner one of the defendants, a writ of injunction was served upon the defendant, requiring lmn to refrain from doing certain acts therein specified. While this writ was in full force the petitioner was charged before said court with having violated its terms, and was ordered to show cause why he should not be adjudged guilty of contempt therefor. Upon the hearing of this charge, the court required the petitioner to be sworn as a witness, to which he objected…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Ex Parte KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- New Orleans v. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Ex parte HollisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Haight v. LuciaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- In re NevittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Hotaling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- McClatchy v. Superior Court of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Safer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- McClenny v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.