Legal Opinion
Conn v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 1987No. B026474PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J. *
—Retired Associate Petitioner Conn is the plaintiff in a wrongful termination action. Real parties (collectively referred to as Farmers) represent a majority of the defendants. Petitioner Street is Conn’s attorney. In this original proceeding, we review an order of the respondent court holding petitioners in contempt for disobeying a court order directing them to return to Farmers certain documents taken by petitioner Conn at the time of his departure from Farmers. The respondent court fined Conn and Street each $38,000 ($1,000 per day for 38 days). We issued an order to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Neal v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Hawk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- In Re ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Reliable Enterprises, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- In Re KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- SCHOOL DIST. OF OKALOOSA CTY. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro v. SchectmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- People v. DjekichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Swift v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA CTY.California Court of Appeal · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.