Legal Opinion

Little Dorrit Gold Mining Co. v. Arapahoe Gold Mining Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1902No. 4219PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Teller County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

The subject matter of controversy is the conflict between the Wild Cat and Dorrit lode mining claims. The former is owned by appellee and the latter by appellant. The Dorrit company applied for a patent upon its claim, which was adversed by the Arapahoe company, as the owner of the Wild Cat The latter company brought an action in support of its adverse. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

August 3, 1891, the Wild Cat was regularly located and all steps taken necessary to perfect a valid location. In September, 1895, the owners. of the Wild Cat and other claims known as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGinnis v. EgbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
  2. Ruby Chief Mining & Milling Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  3. De St. Aubin v. Marshall Field & Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1900

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Anvil Hydraulic & Drainage Co. v. CodeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
  2. In re Estate of HayesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  3. Nelson v. NelsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Graves v. DavenportSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  5. McCormick v. ParriottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API