McCormick v. Parriott
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from the District Court of Clear Creek County: Hon. A. H. De France, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gunter
delivered the- opinion of the court.
*383This was an adverse suit involving as its material issue the value of assessment work done by appellants (defendants) for 1899.
The work consisted of two shafts, one upon each claim; the evidence as to its value was conflicting.' A view was permitted, as provided by Mills’ Ann. Code, see. 188a. The assessment work was then in practically the sáme condition as when performed.
In the course of argument to the jury counsel for appellees, in effect, said, that the jury, having seen the work, could say whether it was of the value of $100.00. This statement was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Quimby v. BoydSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
- Medano Ditch Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- Porter v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
- Little Dorrit Gold Mining Co. v. Arapahoe Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- Fleming v. DalyColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- McKirahan v. Gold King Mining Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. CrossgroveSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. CrossgroveSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012