Legal Opinion
Anvil Hydraulic & Drainage Co. v. Code
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 3, 1910No. 1,794PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The writ of error in this case brings under review the instructions given by the court below to the jury on the trial of an action of ejectment, in which was involved the title to placer claim No. 2 on Holyoke creek in the Nome mining district. The defendants in error had brought the action, claiming under a location made on April 9, 1906, fol-.owing the'alleged failure of the plaintiff in error to do "the *517assessment -work on the claim for the year 1905. The plaintiff in error claimed under a location made on January 10, 1901, and contended and offered proof to show…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
- Chambers v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Jackson v. RobySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co.District Court, D. California · 1881
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lee v. GiauqueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- Berkshire Oil Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
- Connell v. Muslow Oil Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- People v. City of LemooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Consolidated Mut. Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.