Legal Opinion

McGinnis v. Egbert

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 15, 1884PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from District Court of San Juan County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, C. J.

The appellants, McGinnis and Shields, brought this action in support of an adverse claim filed by them against the issuance of a patent to the Winnebago lode upon the application of the defendant Egbert. The complaint alleges the right of the plaintiffs to occupy and possess said mining claim, or the greater part of it, by virtue of a location of the same on the 19th day of July, 1880, under the name of the Little Chief. It alleges *43that said defendant wrongfully ousted the plaintiffs on the 24th day of February, 1882.

It is contended that the plaintiffs established on the trial the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Faxon v. BarnardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1880

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
  2. Buffalo Zinc & Copper Co. v. CrumpSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
  3. Upton v. Santa Rita Mining Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Sharkey v. CandianiOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Burke v. McDonaldIdaho Supreme Court · 1890

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API