Graves v. Davenport
Supreme Court of Colorado
Appeal from Pueblo District Cou,rt—Hon. John H. Voorhees, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Musser
This is an action for claim and delivery of a horse. ' The appellants were defendants below. About six or seven years before the commencement of the action, the minor son of plaintiff worked for one Krensky. At that time, Krensky owned a mare that was running in the pasture of one Sease. This *271mare bore Krensky’s brand, was wild, and had wan,dered into this pasture, where it remained for many years. Krensky, with the consent of the boy’s father, made an .arrangement whereby the boy was to have this animal and pay the purchase price in work. The appellants claim that the title was not to pass…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Little Dorrit Gold Mining Co. v. Arapahoe Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- Waterhouse v. ChurchillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902
- Hasse v. HerringSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wood Bros. Homes, Inc. v. HowardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Gorsich v. Double B Trading Co., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Wood Bros. Homes, Inc. v. HowardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993