Legal Opinion

Wartensleben v. Willey

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1966No. 3455PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McINTYRE

The Plaintiff, Thomas Wartensleben, brought a tort action against his neighbor, Ralph Willey, and against Willey’s attorney, William D. Redle, for damages which plaintiff claims to have suffered because Willey and Redle caused Sheridan Flouring Mills, Inc., not to complete a contract with Wartensleben pertaining to the establishment of a feed lot for cattle on War-tensleben’s land.

The findings of the trial court included a finding that actions of the defendants were the cause of plaintiff’s failure to secure the contract with Sheridan Flouring Mills, for construction and operation of the feed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dill v. Excel Packing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Kramer v. SweetOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Hillmer v. McConnell BrothersWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  4. McCollum v. KolokotronesMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Basham v. Eureka Locker & Cold Storage, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1947

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Blake v. LevySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Kvenild v. TaylorWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Birt v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Toltec Watershed Improvement District v. JohnstonWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Four Nines Gold, Inc. v. 71 Const., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API