Legal Opinion

Dill v. Excel Packing Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 8, 1958No. 40,824PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This is an action by various suburban property owners (plaintiffs-appellees) to enjoin the operation and maintenance of a cattle feed lot in the immediate neighborhood of their homes on the ground that such operation constitutes a nuisance. From a judgment of the lower court which permanently restrained and enjoined the appellants (defendants) from the operation of their cattle feed lot appeal was duly perfected.

The primary question with which this court is confronted is whether a cattle feeding operation carried on in a sparsely…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Helms v. Eastern Kansas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Steifer v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  3. Hofstetter v. George M. Myers, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  4. Bielman v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. City of Lakeland v. State Ex Rel. HarrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sound Storm Ent., Inc. v. Keefe, in & for Fayette Cty.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  2. Spur Industries, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Wartensleben v. WilleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Concerned Citizens, United, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. Scott v. JordanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API