Kramer v. Sweet
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.
Plaintiffs brought this suit to enjoin, as a nuisance, the operation of a slaughterhouse by defendants. Prom a decree in favor of plaintiffs, defendant Sweet, who is now the sole defendant, has appealed to this court.
The property upon which the slaughterhouse stands was acquired by defendants in 1943. There was an old building upon it, and, in February of that year, defendant Sweet began to enlarge and improve it, and installed therein machinery and equipment for the operation of a slaughterhouse and meat-processing plant. Adjacent to the building, he erected pens and corrals for the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- American Smelting & Refining Co. v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Trowbridge v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- White v. HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Wade v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Phipps v. Rogue River Valley Canal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- LEVENE ET UX. v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Amphitheaters, Inc. v. Portland MeadowsOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- York Et Ux v. StallingsOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Duddles v. City Council of West LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- Wartensleben v. WilleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.