Legal Opinion

People v. Driscoll

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 10, 1986No. 84SA325PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRSHBAUM, Justice.

Robert J. Driscoll, you appear before this court to receive a public censure for professional misconduct. Your conduct in representing several clients was the focus of three separate grievance proceedings. In response to the petitions filed in those proceedings, you have by stipulation admitted essentially all of the material facts of misconduct alleged therein. Formal hearings were conducted to develop facts sufficient to establish an appropriate penalty for your admitted misconduct. At the conclusion of the proceedings, the hearing panel recommended imposition of a public…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  3. People v. StaufferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. People v. AbelmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. People v. StevensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API