People v. Holt
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
In this attorney disciplinary proceeding, a majority 1 of a hearing panel of Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved the findings of the hearing board but, because of the seriousness of the misconduct, modified the recommendation for discipline to suspension for one year and one day. After considering the gravity of the misconduct, but also taking into account significant factors in mitigation, we accept the recommendation of the hearing panel, suspend the respondent for one year and one day, and order that he pay the costs of the proceeding.
I
The respondent was admitted to the bar of this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. MorleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- People v. BennettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Barber Pure Milk Co. v. Alabama State Milk Control BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- People v. AbelmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- People v. GrenemyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. StaufferSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- People v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- People v. StevensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- People v. McIntyreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Lawyer Disciplinary Bd. v. SidiropolisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.