Pierce v. Morris
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Jacob E. K. Morris, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Cattaraugus Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Cattaraugus on the 10th day of May, 1919, limiting the scope of the examination of the defendant before trial.
1Opinion of the Court
Hubbs, J.:
The plaintiff, an infant twelve years of age, was seriously injured by being run down by an automobile owned by the *503defendant. An order was made, under section 873 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to examine the defendant generally. Upon motion of the defendant, made upon the papers upon which' the original order was granted, the Special Term limited the scope of the examination and the defendant has appealed from said order upon the ground that the court did not limit the scope of the examination sufficiently. The order appealed from permitted the examination of the defendant upon…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Herbage v. . City of UticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Terry v. Ross Heater & Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Akhurst v. National Starch Co.New York Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wertheim v. GrombeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Drake v. Line-a-Time Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Enequist v. Brooklyn City RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Swift v. General Baking Co.New York Supreme Court · 1927
- Murphy v. New York Central RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.