Legal Opinion

West v. Coney Island & Brooklyn Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

Defendant makes this application to vacate a notice of examination of its motorman. The main objection urged which need be considered here is that the witness thus sought to be examined is not of managerial dignity, but merely an ordinary employee whose examination can be sustained only on proof of special circumstances requiring the same. The chief object of the examination is to prove the defective condition of the brakes and appliances. The person to be examined is the motorman who operated the car and who, for all practical purposes, may be regarded as the agent of the corporation most…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lovasz v. FowlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  2. Preiss v. O'DonohueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schonhous v. WeinerNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Enequist v. Brooklyn City RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. Palmer v. HamptonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1927
  4. Swift v. General Baking Co.New York Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Kaminsky v. John F. Trommer, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API