Legal Opinion
Sanders v. Apple Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 21, 2009No. Case C 08-1713 JF (PVT)PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER 2 GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
JEREMY FOGEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Chandra Sanders (“Sanders”), Keith Yonai (‘Yonai”), and Bonnier Corporation (“Bonnier”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action on behalf of themselves and all persons who purchased a 2007 twenty-inch Aluminum iMac desktop computer designed, manufactured, and sold by Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”). Apple moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) and to strike all of the purported class claims. The Court has…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Ries v. Arizona Beverages USA LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Stearns v. Select Comfort Retail Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Keegan v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- In re Rust-Oleum Restore Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.