Legal Opinion

Turpin v. Sortini

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1982No. S.F. 24319PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*223Opinion

KAUS, J.

This case presents the question of whether a child born with an hereditary affliction may maintain a tort action against a medical care provider who — before the child’s conception — negligently failed to advise the child’s parents of the possibility of the hereditary condition, depriving them of the opportunity to choose not to conceive the child. Although the overwhelming majority of decisions in other jurisdictions recognize the right of the parents to maintain an action under these circumstances, the out-of-state cases have uniformly denied the child’s right to bring what…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. In Re QuinlanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  5. Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Avila v. Willits Environmental Remediation TrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Nelson v. KrusenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Burgess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API