Legal Opinion

Yocum v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1944No. 29363PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

On an appeal from an order of the joint board of the state department of labor and industries, a jury returned a verdict in favor of the department on January 10, 1944. On January 13, 1944, the claimant filed his motion for a new trial, which reads as follows:

“Comes now the plaintiff and moves the Court for an order setting aside the verdict in the above entitled cause, and grant to the plaintiff a new trial herein upon the following grounds:
“1. That substantial justice has not been done.
“2. That said verdict is contrary to the evidence and to the law.
“3. That said verdict is not supported by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ahrens v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Bond v. OvensWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Applewhite v. WayneWashington Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coppo v. Van WieringenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Western Asphalt Co. v. ValleWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Cabe v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Cabe v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Coppo v. Van WieringenWashington Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API