Coppo v. Van Wieringen
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
36 Wn.2d 120 (1950)
217 P.2d 294
SHIELDS J. COPPO et al., Respondents,
v.
A.R. VAN WIERINGEN, Appellant. BILL MYERS et al., Respondents,
v.
A.R. VAN WIERINGEN, Appellant.[1]
Nos. 31209, 31210.
The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.
April 6, 1950.
W.E. Du Puis, for appellant.
Durham, Guimont & Durham, for respondents.
HILL, J.
The question presented is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting new trials in two actions for damages resulting from an automobile collision, which actions were consolidated for trial and are consolidated on this appeal.
On May 1, 1948, Shields J. Coppo…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Dewey v. Chicago & N. W. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Clark v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
- Brammer v. LappenbuschWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- Rotting v. ClemanWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Sturtevant Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.