Legal Opinion

Nicholas v. Salisbury Hardware and Furniture Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1958No. 523PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the trial court to submit to the jury the following issue tendered by it: “Is the property described in the complaint a public alley, as alleged in the answer?” The defendant'further assigns as error this part of the charge: “The court holds as a matter of law upon the evidence that the alleyway in controversy is not a public road.”

The defendant asserted in its answer that the plaintiff, or his predecessors in title, dedicated this alley to the public at large, and an acceptance of the dedication by the public generally and by the city of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Milliken v. Denny.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. GroteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Weaver v. . PittsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Chesson v. . JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Tise v. Whitaker-Harvey Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Shear v. Stevens Building Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. State Highway Commission v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Metcalf v. Black Dog Realty, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. City of Scottsdale v. MochoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API