Legal Opinion

Milliken v. Denny.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 24, 1906PublishedCited by 36 opinions

ActioN by J. M. Milliken against G. W. Denny, beard by Judge Q. W. Ward and a jury, at tbe October Term, 1905, of tbe Superior Oourt of Guiluohd. Erom a judgment of nonsuit, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

When this cause was before us at tbe Spring Term, 1904, upon demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint, we were of tbe opinion, and so decided, that tbe mere fact that the deed from Geo. A. Dick, trustee, and Mrs. Mary E. Dick, tbe beneficial owner, to Mrs. Julia P. Dick called for a “stone,” thence north 84 degrees and 22 minutes, west 340 feet along tbe south side of tbe ten foot alley, was not per se sufficient to impose an easement upon tbe ten feet of land referred to as an alley, which passed to tbe owners of tbe lot conveyed. When tbe decision of this court was certified to tbe Superior Oourt…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moose v. . CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Conrad v. West End Hotel & Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Boyden v. . AchenbachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. Kennedy v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  5. Hughes v. Clark.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Davis v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Hege v. SellersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State Highway Commission v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Reed v. ElmoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API