Legal Opinion

Weaver v. . Pitts

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 12, 1926PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

Plaintiffs allege that they have acquired, by prescription, the right to use, for the purposes of ingress and egress, to and from tbeir dwelling-house, situate on tbeir lands described in tbe complaint, a private road, or way, leading from tbeir lands, over and across tbe lands of defendants, to tbe public highway; that defendants have wrongfully obstructed said private road, or way, and prevented the use of the same by plaintiffs; and that plaintiffs have been endamaged by such wrongful acts of defendants. Defendants deny these allegations.

The evidence set out in the case on appeal tends to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Snowden v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Boyden v. . AchenbachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  3. Mebane v. . PatrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
  4. Ingraham v. . HoughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
  5. Boyden v. . AchenbachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Roediger v. CullenWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Chesson v. . JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Nicholas v. Salisbury Hardware and Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Hemphill v. . Board of AldermenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API