Legal Opinion

Shear v. Stevens Building Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 4, 1992No. 9110SC666PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Through their various assignments of error, plaintiffs and defendants argue that the trial court erred in declaring that Cardinal Hills landowners have an appurtenant easement to the lake, that the parties equally share the cost of maintaining the lake and that defendants may develop a portion of the undeveloped property surrounding the lake. We hold that an appurtenant easement by implied dedication was created to the lake and surrounding undeveloped property for the benefit of Cardinal Hills landowners.

Plaintiffs and defendants first assign error to the trial court’s findings…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Green Ex Rel. Downs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Conrad v. West End Hotel & Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Cleveland Realty Company v. HobbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Insurance Co. v. . Carolina BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Chemical Realty Corp. v. Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of HollywoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Medical Staffing Network, Inc. v. RidgwayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. McCrann v. Pinehurst, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Shepard v. Bonita Vista Properties, LPCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. Eley v. Mid/East Acceptance Corp. of N.C., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. 42 East, LLC v. D.R. Horton, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API