Legal Opinion
Douglas v. Monroe
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 26, 2001No. 49A02-0004-CV-268PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOK, Judge
Case Summary
Appellant-plaintiff Carol M. Douglas ("Carol"), individually and as administra-trix of the estate of her deceased son, Curtis K. Douglas ("Curtis"), appeals from the entry of summary judgment on Carol's legal malpractice claim in favor of appel-lee-defendant Deidre Monroe ("Monroe"). We affirm.
Issue
Carol presents one issue, which we restate as whether a genuine issue of material fact regarding the existence of an attorney-client relationship between Monroe and Carol should have precluded summary judgment.
Facts and Procedural History
On April 20, 1997, Curtis, an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Paramo v. EdwardsIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Kurtenbach v. TeKippeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Rubin v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Bernstein v. GlavinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Bamberger & Feibleman v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Demming v. UnderwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Huntington v. RiggsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Alvey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Oxley v. LennIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Thomas Rosenbaum v. Beau WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.