Bernstein v. Glavin
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOK, Judge
Case Summary
Appellant-plaintiff Lee Bernstein (“Bernstein”) appeals the trial court’s denial of her motion for summary judgment on her claim of legal malpractice and its grant of the cross-motion for summary judgment made by appellees-defendants Daniel W. Glavin (“Glavin”) and Beckman, Kelly & Smith (“BKS”) (collectively, “appellees”).
We affirm.
Issues
One issue is dispositive of our review: whether the trial court erred in granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment.
Facts and Procedural History 1
The facts most favorable to Bernstein indicate that in the November/December…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Effects Associates, Inc. v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Bamberger & Feibleman v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Orem v. Ivy Tech State CollegeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Systems, Inc. v. St. Joseph Medical Center of Fort Wayne, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- Barris Industries, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant/appellee v. Worldvision Enterprises, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Trustcorp Mortgage Co. v. Metro Mortgage Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hoosier Insurance Co. v. Audiology Foundation of AmericaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Hamilton v. PrewettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Meyer v. Marine Builders, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Zemco Manufacturing, Inc. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.