Legal Opinion

Huntington v. Riggs

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 2007No. 69A01-0607-CV-318PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Appellant-Plaintiff, Debra Huntington (Huntington), appeals the trial court’s denial of her Motion for Summary Judgment and its grant of Appellees-Defendants’, Tom Riggs (Tom), Rosie Riggs, Tommy Riggs, and Barbara Riggs (Barbara) (collectively, the Riggses), Motion for Summary Judgment.

We reverse and enter Summary Judgment in favor of Huntington.

ISSUES

Huntington raises three issues on appeal, which we consolidate and restate as the following two issues:(1) Whether the trial court erred in denying Huntington’s Motion for Summary Judgment claiming that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fraley v. MingerIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Rubin v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Richwine v. Presbyterian ChurchIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Dunaway v. Allstate Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Dyer v. EldridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Indiana Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Ash, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Kwolek v. SwickardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Morris v. CrainIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Holland v. SteeleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Martin Oil Marketing Ltd. v. KatziorisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API