Legal Opinion

Kurtenbach v. TeKippe

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 23, 1977No. 59409PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

This is a legal malpractice action which was tried to the court. The trial court entered judgment dismissing the petition on the ground plaintiff Larry O. Kurtenbach failed to prove an attorney-client relationship existed with respect to the transaction upon which he sought to predicate defendant Richard TeKippe’s liability. Kurten-bach contends the evidence established an attorney-client relationship as a matter of law and alleges other errors. We affirm the trial court.

Our review of a law action tried to the court is governed by well established principles. The trial…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Baker v. BealSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  3. Hansen v. WightmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Cook, Flanagan & Berst v. ClausingWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Kukla v. PerryMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Warren B. Sheinkopf v. John K.P. Stone Iii, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. Robertson v. Gaston Snow & Ely BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Miller v. MooneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Page v. FrazierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. DeVaux v. American Home Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API