Legal Opinion
Bamberger & Feibleman v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 28, 1996No. 49A02-9510-CV-590PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The law firms of Bamberger & Feibleman ("Bamberger") and Cannavo & Ripley ("Can-navo") appeal from the trial court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Indianapolis Power & Light Company ("IPL"). On September 16, 1994, Bamberger and Cannavo filed an action against IPL and sought damages resulting from the closure of their offices during an electrical power outage. They asserted two theories of liability against IPL: strict liability and negligence.
Bamberger and Cannavo moved for summary judgment on all issues. IPL filed a cross-motion for summary…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Petroski v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Martin Rispens & Son v. Hall Farms, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
- Reed v. Central Soya Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Merrill v. Knauf Fiber Glass GmbHIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- A.I. Credit Corporation v. Legion Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Bernstein v. GlavinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Armstrong v. Cerestar USA, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Foster v. Evergreen Healthcare, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.