Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. All States Relocation Services, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided September 25, 2000No. Civ.A. CV400-077PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MOORE, District Judge.

Before this Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 2). Defendants assert that under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons stated herein, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. After careful' consideration, this Court finds that all claims for damages to goods are preempted by the Carmack Amendment and to the extent that Plaintiff has filed claims for such damage 1 other than under the Carmack Amendment, those claims are dismissed. This…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Murray Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  5. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. York v. Day Transfer Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2007
  2. Glass v. Crimmins Transfer Co.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2004
  3. Lamm v. Bekins Van Lines Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
  4. Heniff Transportation System, L.L.C. v. Trimac Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  5. Rosenthal v. United Van Lines, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API