Legal Opinion
Glass v. Crimmins Transfer Co.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided January 13, 2004No. 01-4096PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GORMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The parties have consented to have this case heard to judgment by a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and the District Judge has referred the case to me. Now before the court are three motions for summary judgment one by each defendant, as well as a “motion to strike the defendants” reply briefs. The motions are fully briefed and the court has carefully considered the matters discussed therein. For the following reasons, two of the motions for summary judgment are allowed and one motion for summary judgment is allowed in…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Great West Casualty Co. v. FlandrichDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
- York v. Day Transfer Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2007
- Ameriswiss Technology, LLC v. Midway Line of Illinois, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
- Garcia v. City of Springfield Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Ivana Vidovic Mlinar v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.